Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 05:29:50 03/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi I would recomend to make a 2in1 Version. Build an Engine that supports WB AND UCI. If you use (or let use) an adapter there will be a point with complains about it and if you have a bug you never know if it is the adaptor (maybe not your own) or your engine. If you allready programed an adapter it should be no problem to implement that inside your engine. Bye Ingo >I am modifying my new baby engine so that it "speaks" UCI. >I use linux and xboard, so I have written a program that "translates" between >xboard and my engine (an adaptor). > >Two questions. > >At the moment the adapter is far from complete but good enough for my needs. >Would anybody need more general version? >Or maybe such an adapter is already available ... > >I intend to release my engine for Windows in the near future (very early >development though). >So it would be a UCI-only engine. >Would an internal Winboard-protocol support be of any use? >In other words (and in reverse), are the Windows adapters (UCI2WB?) good enough? > >Thanks, > >Fabien Letouzey.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.