Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is SPEC a bad test organisation according to Hyatt?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:20:41 03/01/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 01, 2004 at 13:59:25, Eugene Nalimov wrote:

>On March 01, 2004 at 13:49:38, Eugene Nalimov wrote:
>
>>On March 01, 2004 at 12:05:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On February 29, 2004 at 23:38:31, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>You qualify the testresults as done for SPEC as INVALID and INCORRECT?
>>>
>>>YES or NO?
>>>
>>>[bla bla removed]
>>
>>Had you stopped to drink vodka every morning?
>>
>>Please answer only YES or NO.
>>
>>[bla bla removed]
>
>So, my previous post pointed that there are questions for which you cannot
>answer "YES or NO".
>
>And here is *official* SPEC data for 1.3GHz K7 and 1.5GHz Itanium2:
>
>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2001q4/cpu2000-20011008-01018.html
>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2004q1/cpu2000-20040126-02775.html
>
>Thanks,
>Eugene


Please do not confuse discussions with Vincent by supplying real data.  Things
stay on a more equal footing if you just make up stuff and post it here.

<sarcasm off>

:)



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.