Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A little match Junior - Postmodernist

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 13:03:42 03/01/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 29, 2004 at 20:34:38, Peter Berger wrote:

>On February 29, 2004 at 20:05:08, Dieter Buerssner wrote:
>
>>On February 29, 2004 at 18:03:20, Peter Berger wrote:
>>
>>>[Event "Blitz:45'+10"]
>>>[Site "Berlin"]
>>>[Date "2004.02.27"]
>>>[Round "3"]
>>>[White "Postmodernist 1.010"]
>>>[Black "Junior 8"]
>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>[ECO "C47"]
>>>[Annotator "PIV1.8-PIV3.2HT"]
>>>[PlyCount "138"]
>>>[EventDate "2004.??.??"]
>>>[TimeControl "2700+10"]
>>>
>>>{288MB, Junior8.ctg, P418} 1. e4 {0} e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {4} Nc6 {0} 3. Nc3 {(Lb5) 2}
>>>Nf6 {1} 4. d4 {3} exd4 {0} 5. Nxd4 {3} Bb4 {0} 6. Nxc6 {3} bxc6 {0} 7. Bd3 {4}
>>>d5 {0} 8. exd5 {4} cxd5 {0} 9. O-O {4} O-O {0} 10. Bg5 {4} c6 {0} 11. Qf3 {
>>>(Sa4) 4} Be7 {0} 12. Rae1 {(Tfe1) 5} Re8 {0} 13. Nd1 {(Lf4) 4} Bg4 {-0.34/15 58
>>>} 14. Qf4 {173} Be6 {-0.30/16 104} 15. Qg3 {(Da4) 44} Rb8 {-0.49/15 79} 16. a3
>>>{(f4) 53} c5 {-0.83/16 144} 17. Bh6 {(h3) 144} Bf8 {-0.96/17 220} 18. c3 {
>>>(b3) 5} Nh5 {-0.99/16 110} 19. Qf3 {(De5) 5} gxh6 {-0.98/16 111} 20. Qxh5 {111}
>>>c4 {-1.03/18 1} 21. Bc2 {106} Qg5 {-1.00/18 18} 22. Re5 {77} Qxh5 {-0.93/17 1}
>>>23. Rxh5 {91} Kg7 {-0.92/18 1} 24. Bf5 {98} Bd6 {-0.77/18 1} 25. g3 {86} a5 {
>>>-0.64/17 1} 26. Kg2 {(Lxe6) 92} a4 {-0.43/17 109} 27. f4 {(Lxe6) 89} Rb5 {
>>>-0.28/16 47} 28. Bxe6 {31} Rxe6 {-0.44/16 20} 29. Rf2 {(Kf3) 56} Kg6 {
>>>-0.16/16 60} 30. g4 {15} Re4 {0.12/16 45} 31. Kg3 {(Tf5) 84} f6 {-0.04/16 77}
>>>32. h3 {(Tf5) 4} Bb8 {-0.19/16 77} 33. Rf5 {4} Bc7 {0.00/16 43} 34. Rh2 {
>>>(Kf3) 82} h5 {0.00/17 78} 35. Kf3 {79} Bb6 {0.00/18 6} 36. Rh1 {(Td2) 77} h4 {
>>>-0.20/16 33} 37. Rf1 {(Th5) 33} h6 {-0.20/17 33} 38. Rh1 {(Th5) 73} Kf7 {
>>>-0.20/17 37} 39. Rh2 {(Th5) 118} Re1 {-0.67/16 40} 40. Rd2 {19} Rh1 {
>>>-0.69/16 14} 41. Kg2 {45} Rg1+ {-0.83/17 1} 42. Kh2 {57} Rg3 {-0.76/17 3} 43.
>>>Nf2 {(Tfxd5) 55} Be3 {-0.90/16 67} 44. Re2 {4} Bc1 {-0.96/15 26} 45. Ne4 {270}
>>>Re3 {-0.65/19 1} 46. Rxe3 {37} Rxb2+ {-0.65/19 1} 47. Kh1 {46} Bxe3 {
>>>-0.95/18 49} 48. Nxf6 {4} d4 {-0.95/18 244} 49. Nd5+ {(Se4+) 4} Kg7 {
>>>-1.00/17 32} 50. cxd4 {(Sxe3) 4} Bxd4 {-1.55/16 38} 51. Nc7 {7} Re2 {
>>>-1.36/16 57} 52. Rd5 {5} Bb2 {-1.58/15 35} 53. Rd7+ {9} Kf8 {-1.83/17 48} 54.
>>>Rd8+ {4} Kf7 {-1.53/18 37} 55. Rd7+ {8} Re7 {-1.83/18 2} 56. Rxe7+ {43} Kxe7 {
>>>-2.39/20 1} 57. Nd5+ {46} Ke6 {-2.27/22 1} 58. Ne3 {50} Bxa3 {-2.27/21 1} 59.
>>>f5+ {(Sxc4) 49} Kf6 {-2.55/21 29} 60. Nxc4 {13} Bc5 {-2.83/22 11} 61. Kh2 {
>>>(Kg2) 174} a3 {-3.05/22 21} 62. Nxa3 {10} Bxa3 {-3.06/25 21} 63. Kg2 {15} Bc5 {
>>>-4.09/30 7} 64. Kf3 {176} Ke5 {-4.11/35 1} 65. f6 {(Kg2) 100} Kxf6 {-4.16/28 23
>>>} 66. Kf4 {(Ke4) 118} Bb6 {-5.96/33 16} 67. Ke4 {76} Ke6 {-6.26/36 1} 68. Kf4 {
>>>(Kd3) 18} Kd5 {-6.26/32 36} 69. Kf3 {(g5) 38} Ke5 {-8.11/29 20} 0-1

>This may be correct, but it's only one half of the answer IMHO. I wonder if
>black couldn't have won if it had been aware of the danger - for example I
>wonder about 58. ..Bxa3 ?! in the diagram position - this is the part I am
>really completely unsure about.

To me, it seems, black could have won even later by 61...h5. I did not study all
variations (yet). A sample game vs Shredder 6 at 40 moves in 2 h:

[D] 8/8/5k1p/2b2P2/p1N3Pp/7P/7K/8 b - -


[Event "120'/40"]
[Site "Konstanz"]
[Date "2004.03.01"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Shredder 6"]
[Black "Bürßner, Dieter + Yace"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Bürßner,Dieter"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/8/5k1p/2b2P2/p1N3Pp/7P/7K/8 b - - 0 1"]
[PlyCount "63"]
[TimeControl "40/7200:0/0:0/0"]

1... h5 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 2. Kg2 {[%eval -203,19] [%emt 0:03:46]} hxg4 {
(Kg5) [%emt 0:02:30]} 3. hxg4 {[%eval -172,20] [%emt 0:06:47]} Kg5 {
[%emt 0:00:18]} 4. Kh3 {[%eval -145,18] [%emt 0:03:15]} Bf2 {
(Be7) [%emt 0:00:00]} 5. Na3 {[%eval -156,18] [%emt 0:02:54]} Bg3 {
(Bd4) [%emt 0:00:40]} 6. Nc4 {[%eval -163,20] [%emt 0:04:20]} Bf2 {
(Be1) [%emt 0:04:52]} 7. Na3 {[%eval -165,19] [%emt 0:04:31]} Bd4 {
(Be1) [%emt 0:00:05]} 8. Nc2 {[%eval -166,21] [%emt 0:06:55]} Bf6 {
(Bb2) [%emt 0:00:03]} 9. Na3 {[%eval -352,20] [%emt 0:21:18]} Kf4 {
[%emt 0:00:24]} 10. Nb5 {[%eval -353,19] [%emt 0:02:52]} Be7 {[%emt 0:00:04]}
11. f6 {[%eval -426,18] [%emt 0:08:37]} Bxf6 {[%emt 0:00:04]} 12. Na3 {
[%eval -683,18] [%emt 0:06:23]} Bb2 {(Ke3) [%emt 0:00:05]} 13. Nc4 {
[%eval -678,19] [%emt 0:03:57]} Ke4 {(Kg5) [%emt 0:00:05]} 14. g5 {
[%eval -872,18] [%emt 0:05:27]} Kd4 {[%emt 0:00:04]} 15. Nd6 {
[%eval -895,17] [%emt 0:04:21]} Kc5 {[%emt 0:00:02]} 16. Ne4+ {
[%eval -969,16] [%emt 0:01:51]} Kb4 {[%emt 0:00:04]} 17. g6 {
[%eval -968,13] [%emt 0:02:13]} a3 {[%emt 0:00:21]} 18. Nf2 {
[%eval -1510,15] [%emt 0:04:43]} a2 {[%emt 0:01:04]} 19. Nd3+ {
[%eval -1618,15] [%emt 0:03:20]} Kb5 {[%emt 0:00:13]} 20. Kg4 {
[%eval -1984,14] [%emt 0:03:42]} a1=Q {[%emt 0:00:19]} 21. Nf4 {
[%eval -32752,11] [%emt 0:02:55]} h3 {(Qg1+) [%emt 0:00:06]} 22. g7 {
[%eval -32756,9] [%emt 0:00:53]} Bxg7 {[%emt 0:00:13]} 23. Nxh3 {
[%eval -32757,99] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qd4+ {(Qc3) [%emt 0:00:25]} 24. Kg3 {
[%eval -32757,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qd3+ {(Ka4) [%emt 0:00:20]} 25. Kg4 {
[%eval -32759,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qe4+ {[%emt 0:00:15]} 26. Kg3 {
[%eval -32760,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Bf6 {(Be5+) [%emt 0:00:19]} 27. Kf2 {
[%eval -32761,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Bh4+ {(Bd4+) [%emt 0:00:16]} 28. Kg1 {
[%eval -32761,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qe2 {(Qf3) [%emt 0:00:13]} 29. Kh1 {
[%eval -32763,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Bg3 {(Qf3+) [%emt 0:00:27]} 30. Kg1 {
[%eval -32763,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qh2+ {(Ka4) [%emt 0:00:13]} 31. Kf1 {
[%eval -32764,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Bh4 {(Ka4) [%emt 0:00:17]} 32. Nf2 {
[%eval -32766,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qxf2# {[%emt 0:00:02]} 0-1

I teased Shredder a bit - In the first 9 moves, I made 8 moves, that where not
expected by it. I excersized the position a bit, and could make memorized moves
often. Typically I could move a tempo (the thinking times do not show it always,
because I phoned at the same time).

Somewhat strange was, that a "coach" popped up around move 20, advincing me,
that I made some really inverior move (Yace showed mate score at that time ...)

Regards,
Dieter



This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.