Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 13:35:06 03/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2004 at 16:27:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 01, 2004 at 16:20:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On March 01, 2004 at 15:22:10, Brian Richardson wrote: >> >>>On March 01, 2004 at 14:24:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On March 01, 2004 at 14:20:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 01, 2004 at 13:59:25, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On March 01, 2004 at 13:49:38, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On March 01, 2004 at 12:05:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On February 29, 2004 at 23:38:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>[snip] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You qualify the testresults as done for SPEC as INVALID and INCORRECT? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>YES or NO? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>[bla bla removed] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Had you stopped to drink vodka every morning? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Please answer only YES or NO. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>[bla bla removed] >>>>>> >>>>>>So, my previous post pointed that there are questions for which you cannot >>>>>>answer "YES or NO". >>>>>> >>>>>>And here is *official* SPEC data for 1.3GHz K7 and 1.5GHz Itanium2: >>>>>> >>>>>>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2001q4/cpu2000-20011008-01018.html >>>>>>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2004q1/cpu2000-20040126-02775.html >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks, >>>>>>Eugene >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Please do not confuse discussions with Vincent by supplying real data. Things >>>>>stay on a more equal footing if you just make up stuff and post it here. >>>>> >>>>><sarcasm off> >>>>> >>>>>:) >>>> >>>> >>>>For those that didn't look at the data, the 1.5ghz K7 compared to the 1.5ghz >>>>itanium shows a 50% faster speed on the Itanium. IE the K7 took 127 seconds to >>>>run the test, the Itanium took 80. >>>> >>> >>>Yes, but isn't the K7 a 32 bit CPU, whereas the Itanium2 is 64 bits? >>>If so, then clock for clock is not very indicative, especially >>>quoting a 2 1/2 year old benchmark. >> >>Vincent quoted K7 vs Itanium. Eugene responded with data for those two >>processors. I didn't pick them either. >> > >Quote on: > >The speedwin from crafty when going from K7 to Itanium2, was real real small. > >Quote off > >That was What Eugene responded to. > >"real real small" -> 50% faster on Itanium 2. > >"real real small" indeed. > >:) It is useful to remember that Vincent wields with his own mind the most awesome power on earth, a power capable of defeating the combined strength of even 512 processors. > >> >>> >>>How about Opteron vs Itanium? >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>Why 1.5ghz K7? Because Vincent was talking about "clock for clock" and Eugene >>>>chose to supply real data rather than barking up a hollow tree...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.