Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:36:06 03/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2004 at 04:17:05, Jouni Uski wrote: >I think we can safely remove Ruffian from PRO engines, because there is now 4 >(!) versions after free 1.0.5, but it's unclear if ANY is better. I agree that Ruffian 2.x engines may or may not be better. >This is not >professional product! That does not follow. It's certainly strong enough. For instance, it is about the same strength as ChessMaster, according to Leo's list: 1 0 DeepSjeng 1.5 * 2734 0 236 Premier 2 0 The King 3.23 * 2696 0 68 Premier 3 0 Ruffian 2.0.0 * 2691 0 304 Premier 4 0 Gandalf 4.32h * 2650 0 340 Premier 7 0 Rebel 12 * 2627 0 68 Premier And it is on par with Gandalf and Rebel also (both professional engines). I coughed up $29 for a download and I am not sorry about it. I think it is a good idea to encourage new professional engines.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.