Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 05:44:32 12/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 1998 at 08:35:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 09, 1998 at 06:36:02, Mark Young wrote: > >>Many of use have played over the games of Deep Blue Vs GM Kasparov , and Rebel >>10 Vs GM Anand. >> >>My question is what do you think would be the stronger chess program, and by how >>much: >> >>Deep Blue, or Rebel 10 (K6 450Mhz) * 1000 > > >this question makes no sense. In the two longer games Rebel had no real chance, >while deep blue won the match it played. You aren't going to see a rebel*1000 >in the next hundred years, probably. Because technology is nowhere near even >thinking about machines with picosecond cycle types. The technology to produce >such technology doesn't exist yet... > >The next problem is that a special-purpose piece of hardware will *always* be >orders of magnitude faster than general-purpose hardware, so that if we wait for >a 1000x faster rebel, we get a 10000x faster deep blue in the process... I believe he's just asking (if it were possible) and both where run at the ame exact settings which one would be stronger.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.