Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 15:45:34 03/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2004 at 18:05:55, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >That apple show was the show of a fool. > >If i remember well they first compiled with GCC at x86 hardware a few >benchmarks. > >Then they compared that with gcc at the G5. > >Real sick compare. > >So all we know it's a slow CPU, that's all. How slow is not clear simply. > LOL- You say some thing about exagerating. :)) I think what he meant is actual data somebody posted some days ago: >machine is dual 2GHz Powermac G5 > >wit default hash, here's results for 1 and 2 cpus >============================================= >Crafty v19.10 (1 cpus) > >White(1): bench >...Total nodes: 89942714 >Raw nodes per second: 1249204 >Total elapsed time: 72 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.888889 >============================================= >Crafty v19.10 (1 cpus) > >White(1): mt=2 >max threads set to 2 >White(1): bench >... >Total nodes: 83479388 >Raw nodes per second: 2455276 >Total elapsed time: 34 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 18.823529 >============================================= Not as good as an Athlon64 3200, I agree, but nevertheless. Ruffian does over 1.6MNPS on a single G5 2Ghz and it's optimized for G5. Do you really think PerOla would show up with a G5 for CCT6 if the G5 is a slow CPU. Please stop makeing statements about stuff you have no idea about. regards Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.