Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Postmodernist's opening play

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 16:08:06 03/01/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 01, 2004 at 18:59:15, Telmo Escobar wrote:

>On February 29, 2004 at 18:03:20, Peter Berger wrote:
>
>
>>
>>There is one major conclusion - can't one of the hobby bookcooks help poor PM a
>>little? It sure needs a better, or at least reasonable opening book.
>>
>
> I could try to edit the file preferred.txt (and then build preferred.bin anew)
>in order to avoid some of the trouble PM faces in this match. But I assume one
>has to preserve the particular style of the engine. For instance, after 1.e4 e6,
>I'd think 2.d4 is best, yet this doesn't look a "postmodern" move. Probably
>2.d3, or even 2.Qe2 a la Chigorin, would be acceptable.
>
> Concerning the Dragon, a petty line of mine, I don't call it an hypermodern
>opening either.
>
>  Telmo

Just forget about PM's "hypermodern" name that it can't really live up to yet,
and provide it with some decent book :).

My gut feeling: against 1. d4 Nimzo and Queen's Indian, against 1. e4 maybe the
Sveshnikov or Paulsen, with white just the major 1. e4 and 1. d4 mainlines
without many modifications - or anything else which is just a bit more
mainstream ;).

I am pretty sure that you'll have an easy time to reach a major improvement, and
PM's fans will be grateful :).

PEter





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.