Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:21:55 03/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2004 at 18:45:34, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >On March 01, 2004 at 18:05:55, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >> >>That apple show was the show of a fool. >> >>If i remember well they first compiled with GCC at x86 hardware a few >>benchmarks. >> >>Then they compared that with gcc at the G5. >> >>Real sick compare. >> >>So all we know it's a slow CPU, that's all. How slow is not clear simply. >> > >LOL- You say some thing about exagerating. :)) > >I think what he meant is actual data somebody posted some days ago: > >>machine is dual 2GHz Powermac G5 >> >>wit default hash, here's results for 1 and 2 cpus >>============================================= >>Crafty v19.10 (1 cpus) >> >>White(1): bench >>...Total nodes: 89942714 >>Raw nodes per second: 1249204 >>Total elapsed time: 72 >>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.888889 >>============================================= >>Crafty v19.10 (1 cpus) >> >>White(1): mt=2 >>max threads set to 2 >>White(1): bench >>... >>Total nodes: 83479388 >>Raw nodes per second: 2455276 >>Total elapsed time: 34 >>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 18.823529 >>============================================= > > >Not as good as an Athlon64 3200, I agree, but nevertheless. > >Ruffian does over 1.6MNPS on a single G5 2Ghz and it's optimized for G5. >Do you really think PerOla would show up with a G5 for CCT6 if the G5 is a slow >CPU. > >Please stop makeing statements about stuff you have no idea about. > May as well ask a pig to stop rolling around in crap. It will have about the same effect...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.