Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is SPEC a bad test organisation according to Hyatt?

Author: Frank E. Oldham

Date: 21:44:37 03/01/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 01, 2004 at 22:59:38, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>Now compare with Opteron with 400Mhz RAM. Blows this cpu away left and right!
>
>I hope you realize the weakest chain is memory latency. Both crafty and that
>ruffian are way too memory oriented. G5 trivially is good there, just like
>Opteron with its on die memory controller.
>
>In 2005 this G5 is still clocked at 2Ghz. Opteron moves by end 2004 to 0.09 and
>will hit way higher clockrates.
>
>So i have no idea where you live in history. It's faster now when using the
>right compiler, and it sure will be a lot faster soon again.
>
>http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2004q1/cpu2000-20040126-02725.html
>
>What i'm seeing here for Power4 really is not impressive despite unified caches.

Actually, IBM has recently released the 970 at 0.09 -- a clock-speed jump to 2.4
or 2.6 is expected
soon, with 3GHz by end of summer.

But the 970 is really more of a transitional chip.  IBM has indicated they plan
to add on-chip
memory controller (a la Opteron), SMT (hyperthreading), and dual cores inn the
follow-on
chips (980 etc.).  So things should continue to improve :-)

Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.