Author: Don Dailey
Date: 07:52:22 12/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 1998 at 08:44:32, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >On December 09, 1998 at 08:35:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 09, 1998 at 06:36:02, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>Many of use have played over the games of Deep Blue Vs GM Kasparov , and Rebel >>>10 Vs GM Anand. >>> >>>My question is what do you think would be the stronger chess program, and by how >>>much: >>> >>>Deep Blue, or Rebel 10 (K6 450Mhz) * 1000 >> >> >>this question makes no sense. In the two longer games Rebel had no real chance, >>while deep blue won the match it played. You aren't going to see a rebel*1000 >>in the next hundred years, probably. Because technology is nowhere near even >>thinking about machines with picosecond cycle types. The technology to produce >>such technology doesn't exist yet... >> >>The next problem is that a special-purpose piece of hardware will *always* be >>orders of magnitude faster than general-purpose hardware, so that if we wait for >>a 1000x faster rebel, we get a 10000x faster deep blue in the process... > >I believe he's just asking (if it were possible) and both where run at the ame >exact settings which one would be stronger. A version of Rebel running on something between 5x and 100x the hardware you stated would equal the current best deep blue. Of course this is just my opinion, don't shoot me for it. - Don
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.