Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:54:45 03/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2004 at 16:45:21, Andrew Wagner wrote: >Hmm, you guys are fast, but I'm not sure either of you actually completely read >my post :). The two keys are > >1.) "mass-produce" (i.e. not copy and paste a fen and type 'perft 1', 'perft 2', >etc.) Seems it should not be hard to have a program spit out the intermediate results. So if you said: Perft 5 It would also print out perft for 1,2,3,4 >and 2.) "my own positions" - the ones on peter's site are great, but if your >program is off in one of those positions it's very hard to track down a bug from >it. On the other hand, the right answers are provided. >I want to put together a list of simple positions that will test perft for >very specific things. in fact, here, let me paste my first set of test >positions, for castling: It is a good idea to start simple. Also include cases where e.p. capture comes into play, underpromotion comes into play, etc. [snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.