Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SCO watch (linux and the law)

Author: margolies,marc

Date: 13:54:55 03/03/04

Go up one level in this thread


Ok, Bo, I understand your reasoning now and can respect it: a marketing tool
first. second, a penny-ante shake down.


On March 03, 2004 at 15:57:10, Bo Persson wrote:

>On March 02, 2004 at 22:10:59, margolies,marc wrote:
>
>>that's a curious perception, Bo.
>>In order to discount something, it must have value to the purchaser anyway.
>
>It has a potential value.
>
>If they pay $1M now, they will never be sued by SCO. They can use that in
>marketing:
>
>"We are fully insured against all legal troubles - use our servers!"
>
>What if they were sued, and -horror- lost:
>
>- pay up $699 license times 20000 servers
>- additional damages
>- $1M+ legal fees for their own lawyers
>
>
>>Which brings us back to the point of what it it that a certain commercial server
>>is buying from SCO and why have they chosen to do it.
>
>Protection. "Pay up, and nothing bad will happen."
>
>
>Bo Persson



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.