Author: Albert Silver
Date: 19:30:19 03/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2004 at 17:22:59, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On March 03, 2004 at 08:23:08, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On March 01, 2004 at 15:10:56, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> # Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
>>>13 14 Score Buch Sommb
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 1 Ruffian_202 **** =1= 01= =01 =10 0==1 1=0 11=1 111 111 11= 1110
>>>0=1 1=11 30.0/43 882.5 595.50
>>> 2 Ruffian_105 =0= **** 1=0 === ==1 =11 1111 111 1010 001= =01 =10
>>>1111 111 29.0/43 892.5 574.00
>>
>>I'd like to see more game if possible.
>
>I've seen enough. When programs are this close in strength, it's a random walk.
> A hundred games will put one in the lead. A hundred more another. It took
>several days to run this test and I found out all that I needed to know.
>Namely, the programs are about of the same strength.
Perhaps so, but if you accept that the performances of the Ruffians is correct
then you also agree that Crafty for example is that much weaker. Do you?
Albert
>
>>In any case, many thanks for the results
>>so far. What were the opening books used? I know that List doesn't come with one
>>for example.
>
>All opening books are defaults. If List has no book, it may not have used one.
>However, I will have put all versions of List into the same directory, so it may
>have used a book from an earlier version of List.
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.