Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Arno Nickel's computer match

Author: Arno Nickel

Date: 04:43:17 03/04/04

Go up one level in this thread

>Are we discussing about books or about a concrete variation and concrete
>positions? I mentioned Speelman, because 13..Qf6 was his proposal, nothing else.
>You did show even one real argument to proof that the variation (by the way:
>which one?) could be "unsound". It's just your personal view, a very subjective
>view - but you spread it here, as if it were a fact. That's what I critizise.
>Bad style.

Please read:

... You did not show even one real argument ...

• Re: Arno Nickel's computer match Geert van der Wulp 04:45:16 03/04/04
  • Re: Arno Nickel's computer match Tansel Turgut 15:46:05 03/04/04
    • Re: Arno Nickel's computer match Uwe Meißner 16:48:23 03/04/04
      • Re: Arno Nickel's computer match Tansel Turgut 17:14:01 03/04/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.