Author: Geert van der Wulp
Date: 04:45:16 03/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 2004 at 07:43:17, Arno Nickel wrote: > >>Are we discussing about books or about a concrete variation and concrete >>positions? I mentioned Speelman, because 13..Qf6 was his proposal, nothing else. >>You did show even one real argument to proof that the variation (by the way: >>which one?) could be "unsound". It's just your personal view, a very subjective >>view - but you spread it here, as if it were a fact. That's what I critizise. >>Bad style. > >Please read: > >... You did not show even one real argument ... Well, he ALMOST played it against a GM! Does that not mean shit to you?? Have respect for THE man! Regards, Geert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.