Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:04:51 03/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2004 at 22:30:19, Albert Silver wrote: >On March 03, 2004 at 17:22:59, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 03, 2004 at 08:23:08, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On March 01, 2004 at 15:10:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> # Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >>>>13 14 Score Buch Sommb >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> 1 Ruffian_202 **** =1= 01= =01 =10 0==1 1=0 11=1 111 111 11= 1110 >>>>0=1 1=11 30.0/43 882.5 595.50 >>>> 2 Ruffian_105 =0= **** 1=0 === ==1 =11 1111 111 1010 001= =01 =10 >>>>1111 111 29.0/43 892.5 574.00 >>> >>>I'd like to see more game if possible. >> >>I've seen enough. When programs are this close in strength, it's a random walk. >> A hundred games will put one in the lead. A hundred more another. It took >>several days to run this test and I found out all that I needed to know. >>Namely, the programs are about of the same strength. > >Perhaps so, but if you accept that the performances of the Ruffians is correct >then you also agree that Crafty for example is that much weaker. Do you? Sure, within the error bars (of 300 Elo). I only wanted to know if the new versions were dominatingly better. They do not appear to be.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.