Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 12:26:01 03/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 2004 at 15:02:23, Jorge Pichard wrote: >The Old WBEC Rating List was better and closer to human strength the the newer >Rating List. Instead of comparing it to the already overated SSDF Rating List, >it would have been better to leave it as it was. > Such asseveration requires some proof, do you have any or is there another firing to the empty topics of this Forum. >Jorge > >The new list is the startlist for edition 7! >60 rating points are add to all engines since edition 6 is finished, this to >make the ratings more comparable to the SSDF list as far the engines play at >both the WBEC and SSDF. > As far as I know, Leo has never tried to establish any similarity with the SSDF List. As far as I know, the structure of his list has been an iterative debugger process to reach a good reference of the Wb Engines strength. ???? Could you explain how you can draw such relations?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.