Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 13:22:02 03/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 2004 at 15:26:01, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On March 04, 2004 at 15:02:23, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>The Old WBEC Rating List was better and closer to human strength the the newer >>Rating List. Instead of comparing it to the already overated SSDF Rating List, >>it would have been better to leave it as it was. >> > >Such asseveration requires some proof, do you have any or is there another >firing to the empty topics of this Forum. > >>Jorge >> >>The new list is the startlist for edition 7! >>60 rating points are add to all engines since edition 6 is finished, this to >>make the ratings more comparable to the SSDF list as far the engines play at >>both the WBEC and SSDF. >> > >As far as I know, Leo has never tried to establish any similarity with the SSDF >List. As far as I know, the structure of his list has been an iterative debugger >process to reach a good reference of the Wb Engines strength. > > Could you explain how you can draw such relations? Simply click rating under his own Webpage:http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/index.html
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.