Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 01:41:22 03/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2004 at 04:26:25, Dan Andersson wrote: > You are not taking that post seriously are you? > >MvH Dan Andersson At least the book issue is something. Before the Leiden tournament there was some posting here that suggested that a book author did test hard against opponents books. Nothing wrong with this but later we see that SSDF use the same book in their testing. Another issue is the book learning, this make the list unuseful to check which engine to bye for human games or analysis. Eg. the importantness of the list is only for those who like to play comp-comp games. I don't have thought too much of alternative test forms here but tournaments instead of maches could maybe be something. I will not comment on the other issue in Diepeveen's post since I don't know anything on SSDF's testers and their ability. Odd Gunnar
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.