Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:02:41 03/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2004 at 08:55:05, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>On March 05, 2004 at 08:49:14, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>Please ask SSDF at what hardware they *really* test, not what is put in the
>list. And/or whether they use time compensation.
>
>I really like to see all games they play and like to be able to see the moves
>played there show up at the screen here too. That is something SSDF can easily
>provide (only count for their rating list games that get published) and should
>do to start with to get more credibility.
>
>How can you test things without having the games?
>
>There is just 1 tester who publishes games AFAIK.
And the games he publishes suggest different hardware is being used? Yes? You
don't need every game played. Just a few should be necessary to see whether the
times and depths published correspond to the announced hardware configuration
used. Or are you suggesting he uses different hardware than the other testers?
If you can show that the games played and published by Tony Hedlund here do NOT
correspond to the announced hardware, you have a point, otherwise, you're just
making accusations with no facts of any kind to sustain your position. So either
show some kind of analytical evidence to back up your position, or state
outright that you believe Hedlund is rebelling against the SSDF and is using the
announced hardware contrary to the rest of the testers.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.