Author: Geert van der Wulp
Date: 06:09:51 03/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2004 at 09:04:07, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On March 05, 2004 at 08:55:08, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On March 05, 2004 at 08:53:02, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>>You can also prove that you are better than some commercial programs if you are >>>really better than them >> >>Also? Your definition of "X being better than Y" probably doesn't match mine. ;) >> >>Sargon > >Uri as he says himself is more stupid than a 10 year old to understand that >other 10 year old can sometimes not change ini files nor does he see the logics >in that you do not proof to be better than Y when X is better than Z and there >is only the information that Y is better than Z. WRONG!! If X is better than Z, and Y is better than X, then it follows that Y is better than Z! The problem in real life is: How to prove that X is better than Z or Y is better than X. Geert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.