Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 11:42:04 03/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2004 at 14:30:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 05, 2004 at 12:30:43, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On March 05, 2004 at 10:29:16, Bob Durrett wrote: >> >>If you scroll back in CCC archives you will find GCP from Sjeng, who tried to >>figure out why Sjeng was beated so much by CCC users. He substantiated his claim >>that the UCI in fritz8 was putting back the hashtable from game 2 and further to >>1MB for DeepSjeng. >> >>Is that enough for you, or do you need confirmation at the chessbase homepage? > >That has nothing to do with the SSDF and everything to do with ChessBase. > >If you have a bug in your program, is the SSDF responsible for that also? > >Of course, the SSDF will make mistakes, like any organization run by people. > >But the data produce by the SSDF is better than the data produced by any other >chess ranking body, includig FIDE and the USCF. IMO-YMMV. The SSDF is not there to correct their mistakes. Majority of what they play is not published, so we can *never* check the amount of mistakes made. We only know 1 tester from SSDF is transparant.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.