Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 15:21:41 12/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 1998 at 16:16:26, Dan Kiski wrote: >On December 09, 1998 at 15:47:14, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >> >>> >>>As stated before dozens of times I use Faber\Pilz but would take the standard >>>out of the box against Rebel 10 with anti-gm being either on or off, although I >>>understand off is better against other computers. >>> >>>Dan Kiski >> >> >>Here you are totally wrong! If you set anti-gm off then Rebel 10 is a founded >>meal for other programs, but with anti-gm on and the right eco setting it´s very >>hard to beat him. If you want we can do an e-mail game to proof. >> >>Marcus > >I had stated anti-gm off against computers since I had read this somewhere else, >maybe Ed could clarify this subject, however as stated I already own both Rebel >10 and cmk6, and would take this against either settings. Playing an e-mail game >would be pointless since in all likelihood we have different hardware. >In the games I play I use two identical P233 MMX machines each with 64 meg EDO >ram. > >Dan Kiski. Hi Marcus, can you just Post your Rebel 10 configurations so we can all play over your invincible Rebel 10 settings. That would be the easiest way to settle the score. I to have two computer of equal hardware and will play My CM6K settings and the Faber ones and even the Stadard ones against your rebel 10 settings and we will see the results. That is fair don't you think after your very strong comments on how good Rebel 10 is, Or was that just hot wind.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.