Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Need to be multiprocessor for NUMA

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 16:19:36 03/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 05, 2004 at 19:03:56, Keith Evans wrote:

>On March 05, 2004 at 08:51:27, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On March 05, 2004 at 08:47:24, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On March 04, 2004 at 13:28:53, Keith Evans wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 04, 2004 at 12:42:24, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On March 04, 2004 at 09:44:00, Bryan Hofmann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On March 03, 2004 at 21:29:39, David B wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I have a Tyan 2885 currently not sure if its a bios setting or just an OS
>>>>>>>setting within Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition though its supposed to support
>>>>>>>numa which to the life of me I can not get it to do.   Each processor currently
>>>>>>>is running 1gig of ram with Opteron 244's
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I recommend reading the following;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.tyan.com/support/html/f_s2885.html
>>>>>
>>>>>David,
>>>>>
>>>>>Except for DIEP which has NUMA versions, and SOS which is multiprocessing too,
>>>>>but heavily relying upon shared memory, which program do you plan to run that
>>>>>profits from a NUMA machine setup?
>>>>>
>>>>>Nevertheless in your manual from your tyan mainboard you can find how to get
>>>>>numa to work. If i remember well the best thing to do is just fill up all memory
>>>>>banks with memory. That's the best way to do it always.
>>>>
>>>>I understand that Crafty supports NUMA under Windows.
>>>
>>>All crafty does do is put a thread to a specific cpu. Though that is important
>>>condition to run NUMA, it doesn't mean that all other stuff you need for NUMA
>>>gets used.
>>>
>>>It's multithreading of course, so it's completely SMP in that respect.
>>>
>>>I've already explained it a dozen times here. Bob just claims it's NUMA, but he
>>>has not even written the code himself, so he doesn't even know what he talks
>>>about.
>>>
>>>I claim the dual opteron platform to be a better SMP platform than dual P4 Xeon
>>>or dual K7. That it is NUMA too is just good for those who support NUMA. Crafty
>>>in itself will NOT run at NUMA hardware like Origin3800 or Altix3000.
>>>
>>>There NUMA means the random latency from this processors memory to other
>>>processors memory is *significant* slower than that of the SMP machines.
>>>
>>>So crafty is not NUMA at all. It doesn't run on NUMA machines other than the
>>>only NUMA machine where SMP is faster than SMP at others.
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>Vincent
>>
>>To run very well at a 8 processor Xeon, you need to be multiprocessor.
>>So shredder all multithreading thoughts in advance.
>>
>>Diep runs well at 8 processor Xeon. SOS runs well.
>>
>>Crafty,Shredder,Fritz (the commercial version),Junior they run very bad at that
>>hardware.
>>
>>Simply because they are multithreading.
>>
>>As Nalimov has shown you can in theory handicap multithreading to a form that it
>>is more looking like multiprocessing than multithreading.
>>
>>That's not how it gets used in practice and sure not by crafty like that. You
>>simply *need* to be multiprocessor.
>
>The poster was asking about an Opteron system. I think that we all know how well
>Crafty runs on a quad Opteron system from CCT6.

The reason for that is because the latency at quad opteron is better than
similar quad SMP systems.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.