Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 17:32:29 03/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2004 at 09:09:51, Geert van der Wulp wrote: >On March 05, 2004 at 09:04:07, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On March 05, 2004 at 08:55:08, Daniel Clausen wrote: >> >>>On March 05, 2004 at 08:53:02, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>>You can also prove that you are better than some commercial programs if you are >>>>really better than them >>> >>>Also? Your definition of "X being better than Y" probably doesn't match mine. ;) >>> >>>Sargon >> >>Uri as he says himself is more stupid than a 10 year old to understand that >>other 10 year old can sometimes not change ini files nor does he see the logics >>in that you do not proof to be better than Y when X is better than Z and there >>is only the information that Y is better than Z. > >WRONG!! >If X is better than Z, and Y is better than X, then it follows that Y is better >than Z! That's not true - I have seen cases where my Crafty chess clones operate in a fashion x>y y>z z>x did you play ever the childhood game of rock, scissors and paper rock>scissors scissors>paper paper>rock > >The problem in real life is: How to prove that X is better than Z or Y is better >than X. yes, we still have that problem as well > >Geert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.