Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:43:10 03/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 2004 at 14:22:50, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 07, 2004 at 11:46:26, Chessfun wrote: > >> >>Minimum 70 games to qualify. >>All 3,4 and 5 piece tablebases. >>Native books where made, general.ctg where not. >>Majority 9100+ games over 60 mins. >>Games are autoplayed ponder=on and single PC ponder=off. >>AMD XP 2600+ >> >>Hiarcs8 Bareev games at 60' ponder=off using Hiarcs9.ctg >> >>Currently testing Ruffian 2.1 with Lokasoft book. > > >Is movei the next program to be tested? > >I sent to Leo a new version that is probably 1-2 elo better thanks to being >faster unless I have an unexpected bug. > >It is without logfiles that you cannot disable and in order to have logfile with >the new version you need to enable logfile. > >I hope that it has not new bugs. >I tested that it get the same number of nodes in some test positions faster. Ok Uri since I'm currently running two pc's to catch up, tell you what. You tell me the hash size you want to use and I'll give it a whirl. "I believe that 64 mbytes are better than 16 mbytes at 1 minute per game but not at 4 minutes per game because at 4 minutes per game movei clears hash after every move when it is not in time trouble so it spends time about it relative to the case of 16 mbytes." "It is possible that at longer time control the time of clearing hash is not significant and 64 mbytes becomes again better than 16 mbytes." The games will be at 30'/40+30'/40+15' Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.