Author: Geert van der Wulp
Date: 03:20:56 03/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2004 at 06:17:40, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On March 08, 2004 at 05:27:38, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On March 07, 2004 at 11:46:26, Chessfun wrote: >> >>> >>>Minimum 70 games to qualify. >>>All 3,4 and 5 piece tablebases. >>>Native books where made, general.ctg where not. >>>Majority 9100+ games over 60 mins. >>>Games are autoplayed ponder=on and single PC ponder=off. >>>AMD XP 2600+ >>> >>>Hiarcs8 Bareev games at 60' ponder=off using Hiarcs9.ctg >>> >>>Currently testing Ruffian 2.1 with Lokasoft book. >>> >>> >>> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >>> >>> 1 Shredder 8 : 2721 44 47 150 67.3 % 2595 37.3 % >>> 2 Deep Fritz 8 : 2684 45 42 170 61.2 % 2605 36.5 % >>> 3 Hiarcs 9 : 2640 46 37 190 55.5 % 2602 35.3 % >>> 4 Fritz 8 : 2633 29 23 470 55.9 % 2592 38.5 % >>> 5 Deep Fritz 7 : 2633 32 26 374 56.3 % 2589 36.6 % >>> 6 Deep Junior 8 : 2630 43 39 210 57.1 % 2580 28.6 % >>> 7 Tiger 15 normal style : 2629 33 24 377 54.9 % 2594 42.4 % >>> 8 Shredder 7 : 2629 37 31 290 55.3 % 2591 32.8 % >>> 9 Tiger 15 gambit agres : 2626 48 44 163 58.0 % 2570 31.3 % >> >> >> >>Very interesting statistics. >> >>I have just noticed the striking difference in number of draws between CT15 >>normal and CT15 gambit aggressive. >> >>They are close in strength, but the difference in the draw percentage is BIG. >> >>I would not say it's surprising, but it's a confirmation for me. >> >>The smallest number of draws in this list is achieved by Deep Junior 8. >> >>It looks like the strong speculative programs are the ones with a low draw >>percentage. It was expected, somehow, but it is always very interesting to have >>a confirmation by numbers. >> >> >> >> Christophe >> >> >> >> >>> 10 Junior 8 : 2625 45 34 210 54.5 % 2594 36.7 % >>> 11 Shredder 7.04 : 2614 37 28 320 53.8 % 2588 34.4 % >>> 12 Shredder Paderborn : 2613 40 31 262 54.0 % 2585 34.7 % >>> 13 Fritz 7 : 2611 22 19 742 57.9 % 2556 38.9 % >>> 14 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2604 21 16 852 56.0 % 2562 43.4 % > >And take a look at version 14.0. Tiger always have been a "drawmachine". Perhaps >because it plays closest like a GM :) > >Tony > >>> 15 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2602 37 56 150 49.0 % 2609 40.7 % >>> 16 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2602 21 16 878 57.3 % 2550 41.8 % >>> 17 Hiarcs8 Bareev : 2601 53 48 140 56.8 % 2554 29.3 % >>> 18 Fritz 7 (No MMX) : 2600 49 36 162 58.0 % 2544 44.4 % >>> 19 Deep Fritz : 2589 26 20 605 54.1 % 2560 36.9 % >>> 20 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2583 46 32 220 51.4 % 2574 38.2 % Maybe Tiger has difficulties converting a positional advantage into a full point and consequently has a lot of draws? Geert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.