Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 11:31:02 03/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2004 at 04:32:22, Andrew Williams wrote: >On March 08, 2004 at 02:50:56, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On March 07, 2004 at 16:46:28, Andrew Williams wrote: >> >>>improvedpreferred 108.5 - 61.5 standardpreferred >>> >>>The previous match score was 158 - 119 standardpreferred before I stopped it. >>> >>>I would NEVER have imagined a result like it, and it has been VERY easy to do >>>this. >> >> >>Doesn't this sound a little too good to be true actually ? >> >>It might be worth to have a closer look at the game statistics. I fear there >>might be just one or two lines were the new preferred book outperforms the old >>one badly, and they get repeated often in selfplay as you have no learner. >> > >I checked the first match for duplicates and there were none. I'll have to test >the second one when I get back. Remember, I have the huge book to fall back >upon. I also have some time randomization just after the end of the book. > I ended the match when I got back from work this evening. There were a total of 607 games and the final score was: newpreferred +341 -134 =232 I tested for duplicates and found none. Over the next few days, I'll be running some tests vs engines which are similar in strength to PM to see what happens! Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.