Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 14:36:46 03/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2004 at 16:20:21, Michael Yee wrote: >And if you chose to assume that a >consensus of GMs was the "truth", where would the random error be? That's like saying the averages in the rainfall data are the 'truth', and hence, there's no measurement error there, either. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.