Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: TranspositionTables and NULL-move

Author: Michel Langeveld

Date: 03:27:53 03/10/04

Go up one level in this thread


>This could indeed be the reason, but I observed very different behaviour for my
>program when having different sized TT's. The behaviour of the version that
>stores the NULL-move results is very much influenced by the size of the TT,
>while the version without the NULL-move results being stored is performing
>better with increasing TT-size (32, 64 and 128Meg).
>On the other hand, the NULL-move storing version is faster (and expands less
>nodes) when using 64 MegaByte... (Could it be the magic number?)

Maybe 64Mb is huge in the test you perform before the replacement algoritm has
shows its strength.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.