Author: Michael Yee
Date: 12:24:35 03/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2004 at 17:21:02, Dan Andersson wrote: > There are several problems in automated training AFAIK: > One of those is that you have to assume that the tree search isn't >pathological. > Another is that when you are using test sets the played move might have been >chosen by a probabilistic heuristic and not by thourough search. You might call >this the style of the player. > >MvH Dan Andersson That's a good point. There would certainly be some "structural error" based on the limitations of the class of functions we decided to train. But given the function class (which we've assumed is the same for both hand tuning or machine tuning), my main point is that an automatic approach (attempting global optimization of the parameters) could get the most performance out of the chosen function class. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.