Author: Harald Faber
Date: 06:22:19 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 09:08:48, Dan Kiski wrote: >I think that although the difference between CM6555 and test 6 is just .1 that >the main difference in the results is lack of games played, not that it pushes >over the edge. But simply that with the variations in opening available and such >a small sample any result can be discounted. This is why for me the nunn >positions are good because for sure both sides get an equal chance with the same >set-up position after move 10. >Dan Kiski For me this is nonsense. There are programs that handle these FEW positions (only 10) better than others. But there is no need for saying they are stronger. There simply has to be some adjustment on the opening book. The playing style MUST be adjusted with the opening book, or, better to say, vice versa.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.