Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:47:41 03/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2004 at 22:36:15, Johan de Koning wrote: >On March 10, 2004 at 22:32:54, Johan de Koning wrote: > >>On March 10, 2004 at 22:29:20, Johan de Koning wrote: >> >>>On March 10, 2004 at 22:28:10, Johan de Koning wrote: >>> >>>>On March 10, 2004 at 22:25:10, Johan de Koning wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 10, 2004 at 22:22:51, Johan de Koning wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>PS: notice the replies: 1 ply full-width with limited QS. :-) >>>>> >>>>>Allow me to disagree here. >>>> >>>>Whatever. >>>>I'll prove I was right in the first place. >>> >>>Perhaps, but I still don't buy it. >> >>And I still was right to start with. > >Discusion terminated because of 2 x repetition. I remember another case in another forum(in hebrew) when somebody asked someone for the reason that he is discussing with himself. He replied that he enjoys to discuss with smart people. The moderator of that forum replied that people who want to discuss with themselves are asked to do it with personal massages(it is something like email but people do not need to discover their email in order to get a personal message from another person and they can see that they got a personal message when they visit the forum). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.