Author: Bryan Hofmann
Date: 08:41:09 03/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2004 at 09:04:58, Fabien Letouzey wrote: > >On March 11, 2004 at 08:48:51, Afzal Siddique wrote: > >>P4 1.5 GHz >>REMIS.ctg >>32 MB hash for each >>Ponder Off >>Time: 10/40+10/20+15 (i know its a bit wierrd ;-) > >If I understand correctly, that qualifies as "slow time controls" for me. > >>Tourney not over so far.. Fruit will play 10 games against each engine > >>fruit MyTown 2004 > >>Fruit 0.98a - Ruffian 1.0.5 1.0 - 3.0 +0/-2/=2 25.00% >>Fruit 0.98a - Pepito v1.59 1.0 - 3.0 +0/-2/=2 25.00% >>Fruit 0.98a - Ktulu 4.2 0.5 - 3.5 +0/-3/=1 12.50% >>Fruit 0.98a - Delfi 4.4 1.5 - 1.5 +0/-0/=3 50.00% >>Fruit 0.98a - Gothmog 0.4.5 1.5 - 1.5 +1/-1/=1 50.00% >>Fruit 0.98a - Aristarch 4.41 0.0 - 3.0 +0/-3/=0 0.00% >>Fruit 0.98a - List 512 0.0 - 3.0 +0/-3/=0 0.00% >>Fruit 0.98a - The Baron 1.2.0 1.0 - 2.0 +1/-2/=0 33.33% > >We have to wait until all the games are finished of course, but it looks like my >theory that it would resist a bit better at slow time controls might not be true >:) > >Or, are the opponents too strong? I would resommend you visit Leo's site (http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/Rating.html) which will give you a good picture of most of the above engines running at long time controls with pondering. > >I don't know Ktulu or Delfi. I have barely heard of Aristarch before. > >Sorry for my ignorance, I only know Linux engines! > >Fabien.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.