Author: margolies,marc
Date: 13:45:09 03/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
I understand you perfectly Fernando. thanks. american woman however will never understand why their husbands won't ask for directions when driving a car. I think this sort of conversation falls into that category of exploratory indifference. Being a 2100 player is no cause to cry in your beer, my friend. Best regards- Marc On March 11, 2004 at 15:05:15, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Well, Par Excellence is zillions times better machines than those first that >refused to accept they were mated. PE plays at a par with me, so it is not a cae >of milking a cow, as much half of the time is my milk the one flowing... >Yes, nostalgy, but also the capability to face an equal opponent. I just became >titred ot being beaten by 2300+ programs. >I will tell you more. One reason I never got to be better than a 2100 player or >so is that I have NEVER tried to memorize a win in order to repeat it. For the >same reason I have NEVER learned at heart any opoenning. I like to be thinking >from scratch from he very first second. So, I have NEVER tried to get a method >to win the machine as a matter of fact. Each time I play a game I like to feel >as it is the very fist time I play chess. >Weird? >Perhaps, but pleasurable. >My best >Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.