Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 14:58:46 03/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2004 at 09:37:50, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 11, 2004 at 09:04:58, Fabien Letouzey wrote: > >> >>On March 11, 2004 at 08:48:51, Afzal Siddique wrote: >> >>>P4 1.5 GHz >>>REMIS.ctg >>>32 MB hash for each >>>Ponder Off >>>Time: 10/40+10/20+15 (i know its a bit wierrd ;-) >> >>If I understand correctly, that qualifies as "slow time controls" for me. >> >>>Tourney not over so far.. Fruit will play 10 games against each engine >> >>>fruit MyTown 2004 >> >>>Fruit 0.98a - Ruffian 1.0.5 1.0 - 3.0 +0/-2/=2 25.00% >>>Fruit 0.98a - Pepito v1.59 1.0 - 3.0 +0/-2/=2 25.00% >>>Fruit 0.98a - Ktulu 4.2 0.5 - 3.5 +0/-3/=1 12.50% >>>Fruit 0.98a - Delfi 4.4 1.5 - 1.5 +0/-0/=3 50.00% >>>Fruit 0.98a - Gothmog 0.4.5 1.5 - 1.5 +1/-1/=1 50.00% >>>Fruit 0.98a - Aristarch 4.41 0.0 - 3.0 +0/-3/=0 0.00% >>>Fruit 0.98a - List 512 0.0 - 3.0 +0/-3/=0 0.00% >>>Fruit 0.98a - The Baron 1.2.0 1.0 - 2.0 +1/-2/=0 33.33% >> >>We have to wait until all the games are finished of course, but it looks like my >>theory that it would resist a bit better at slow time controls might not be true >>:) >> >>Or, are the opponents too strong? > > >The opponents are strong but the results still suggest that it does not do >better at longer time control. > >> >>I don't know Ktulu or Delfi. I have barely heard of Aristarch before. > >Ktulu and Delfi and aristarch are programs near Crafty level. >Baron and Gothmog are probably slightly weaker. > >Uri Aristarch is clearly stronger than crafty. http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his6thedition.html http://computerschach.de/rangliste/ regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.