Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 14:59:31 03/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2004 at 17:58:46, Joachim Rang wrote: >On March 11, 2004 at 09:37:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 11, 2004 at 09:04:58, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >> >>> >>>On March 11, 2004 at 08:48:51, Afzal Siddique wrote: >>> >>>>P4 1.5 GHz >>>>REMIS.ctg >>>>32 MB hash for each >>>>Ponder Off >>>>Time: 10/40+10/20+15 (i know its a bit wierrd ;-) >>> >>>If I understand correctly, that qualifies as "slow time controls" for me. >>> >>>>Tourney not over so far.. Fruit will play 10 games against each engine >>> >>>>fruit MyTown 2004 >>> >>>>Fruit 0.98a - Ruffian 1.0.5 1.0 - 3.0 +0/-2/=2 25.00% >>>>Fruit 0.98a - Pepito v1.59 1.0 - 3.0 +0/-2/=2 25.00% >>>>Fruit 0.98a - Ktulu 4.2 0.5 - 3.5 +0/-3/=1 12.50% >>>>Fruit 0.98a - Delfi 4.4 1.5 - 1.5 +0/-0/=3 50.00% >>>>Fruit 0.98a - Gothmog 0.4.5 1.5 - 1.5 +1/-1/=1 50.00% >>>>Fruit 0.98a - Aristarch 4.41 0.0 - 3.0 +0/-3/=0 0.00% >>>>Fruit 0.98a - List 512 0.0 - 3.0 +0/-3/=0 0.00% >>>>Fruit 0.98a - The Baron 1.2.0 1.0 - 2.0 +1/-2/=0 33.33% >>> >>>We have to wait until all the games are finished of course, but it looks like my >>>theory that it would resist a bit better at slow time controls might not be true >>>:) >>> >>>Or, are the opponents too strong? >> >> >>The opponents are strong but the results still suggest that it does not do >>better at longer time control. >> >>> >>>I don't know Ktulu or Delfi. I have barely heard of Aristarch before. >> >>Ktulu and Delfi and aristarch are programs near Crafty level. >>Baron and Gothmog are probably slightly weaker. >> >>Uri > > >Aristarch is clearly stronger than crafty. > >http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his6thedition.html >http://computerschach.de/rangliste/ > > >regards Joachim and there is already a version 4.41 of Aristarch which has improved a lot again. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.