Author: Mark Young
Date: 07:14:00 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 09:13:52, Dan Kiski wrote: >On December 10, 1998 at 08:44:29, Mark Young wrote: > >>On December 10, 1998 at 08:34:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>So are You testing with random openings. If yes I think 14 games is almost >>>meaningless! >> >>It is not just 14 games. I am running the same settings as other people that are >>posting here. *To add to the game count*. >> >>I could not run any more games then what I did for this testing. This was the >>limit for CM at one time. And if you read my post, I am running more games with >>the same settings. >> >>SO IT IS NOT MEANINGLESS!!! > >As I already stated I agree meaningless, the nunn positions as a start basis >should be utilized, Please tell me what computer chess god told you this was true. since opening books are so large and any results over 14 >games could be only based on opening advantage. > >Dan Kiski
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.