Author: Dan Kiski
Date: 07:52:34 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 10:14:00, Mark Young wrote: >On December 10, 1998 at 09:13:52, Dan Kiski wrote: > >>On December 10, 1998 at 08:44:29, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:34:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>So are You testing with random openings. If yes I think 14 games is almost >>>>meaningless! >>> >>>It is not just 14 games. I am running the same settings as other people that are >>>posting here. *To add to the game count*. >>> >>>I could not run any more games then what I did for this testing. This was the >>>limit for CM at one time. And if you read my post, I am running more games with >>>the same settings. >>> >>>SO IT IS NOT MEANINGLESS!!! >> >>As I already stated I agree meaningless, the nunn positions as a start basis >>should be utilized, > >Please tell me what computer chess god told you this was true. The god of chess.......chessbase !!. besides if you read what I said, I said I agree, and I am like all others entitled to my own opinion on any given subject and since this is a forum to air my opinion I did so. Dan Kiski > > since opening books are so large and any results over 14 >>games could be only based on opening advantage. >> >>Dan Kiski
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.