Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: More CM 6000 settings tests.

Author: Dan Kiski

Date: 07:56:28 12/10/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 10, 1998 at 10:08:04, Mark Young wrote:

>On December 10, 1998 at 09:55:37, Dan Kiski wrote:
>
>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:42:03, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:13:52, Dan Kiski wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:44:29, Mark Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:34:29, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>So are You testing with random openings. If yes I think 14 games is almost
>>>>>>meaningless!
>>>>>
>>>>>It is not just 14 games. I am running the same settings as other people that are
>>>>>posting here. *To add to the game count*.
>>>>>
>>>>>I could not run any more games then what I did for this testing. This was the
>>>>>limit for CM at one time. And if you read my post, I am running more games with
>>>>>the same settings.
>>>>>
>>>>>SO IT IS NOT MEANINGLESS!!!
>>>>
>>>>As I already stated I agree meaningless, the nunn positions as a start basis
>>>>should be utilized, since opening books are so large and any results over 14
>>>>games could be only based on opening advantage.
>>>
>>>I sorry, I must be typing in an invisible ink. WE ARE PLAYING MORE THE 14 GAMES.
>>> THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN MORE THE 14 GAMES WITH MOST OF THESE SETTING POSTED
>>>ALREADY.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dan Kiski
>>
>>Ok so you are playing more than 14 games, how many opening variations does your
>>computer play, will you play them all as white and black. I can read your ink
>>just can't see why you don't see the results as what they are MEANINGLESS. And
>>that in fact you are just wasting your time by even playing them without setting
>>out specific unbiased criteria for how you are playing them.
>
>I am just lost, I have only been testing chess programs for over 15 years.
>
>You don't know what criteria I have laid out. Because all I am doing is sharing
>raw game data with others that are doing the same thing.
>
You have no criteria, no set openings, no set game amount limitation. As for
time testing, I bought a chess challenger 7 in 1978, I guess I'll claim 20
years.

Dan Kiski.




>>
>>Dan Kiski.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.