Author: Mark Young
Date: 08:05:25 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 10:56:28, Dan Kiski wrote: >On December 10, 1998 at 10:08:04, Mark Young wrote: > >>On December 10, 1998 at 09:55:37, Dan Kiski wrote: >> >>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:42:03, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:13:52, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:44:29, Mark Young wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:34:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>So are You testing with random openings. If yes I think 14 games is almost >>>>>>>meaningless! >>>>>> >>>>>>It is not just 14 games. I am running the same settings as other people that are >>>>>>posting here. *To add to the game count*. >>>>>> >>>>>>I could not run any more games then what I did for this testing. This was the >>>>>>limit for CM at one time. And if you read my post, I am running more games with >>>>>>the same settings. >>>>>> >>>>>>SO IT IS NOT MEANINGLESS!!! >>>>> >>>>>As I already stated I agree meaningless, the nunn positions as a start basis >>>>>should be utilized, since opening books are so large and any results over 14 >>>>>games could be only based on opening advantage. >>>> >>>>I sorry, I must be typing in an invisible ink. WE ARE PLAYING MORE THE 14 GAMES. >>>> THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN MORE THE 14 GAMES WITH MOST OF THESE SETTING POSTED >>>>ALREADY. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Dan Kiski >>> >>>Ok so you are playing more than 14 games, how many opening variations does your >>>computer play, will you play them all as white and black. I can read your ink >>>just can't see why you don't see the results as what they are MEANINGLESS. And >>>that in fact you are just wasting your time by even playing them without setting >>>out specific unbiased criteria for how you are playing them. >> >>I am just lost, I have only been testing chess programs for over 15 years. >> >>You don't know what criteria I have laid out. Because all I am doing is sharing >>raw game data with others that are doing the same thing. >> >You have no criteria, Wow, What else do you know. Is this just your opinion or are you stating a fact? no set openings, no set game amount limitation. As for >time testing, I bought a chess challenger 7 in 1978, So did I but there was not much to test it against in 78. I guess I'll claim 20 >years. I don't care what you claim for yourself, Just don't make claim about me. Because you don't know what you are talking about. > >Dan Kiski. > > > > >>> >>>Dan Kiski.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.