Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:05:54 03/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 12, 2004 at 16:02:18, Chessfun wrote: >On March 12, 2004 at 15:00:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 12, 2004 at 14:22:29, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Hi Sarah >>>A fantastic performance of Rufian 2.1.0 >>>Kurt >> >> >>11 Ruffian 2.1.0 : 2623 62 46 114 53.9 % 2596 37.7 % >>17 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2602 37 56 150 49.0 % 2609 40.7 % >>21 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2583 46 32 220 51.4 % 2573 38.2 % >> >>statistical error is bigger than the 40 elo >> > >As I'm sure you're aware Uri bringing down the statistical error requires >thousands of games, for example: > >On this same list is good old Fritz 6. And even after 1224 games still shows >statistically that it could be 19 points stronger or 14 points weaker than it's >current rating. >30 Fritz 6 : 2543 19 14 1224 53.0 % 2523 37.5 % > >All I'm saying is playing another 200 games with this engine will not resolve >that issue for you. > >Sarah. I do not blame you of not playing enough games and I only responded to the fantastic result claim. If the result is really fantastic then there is no doubt that there is an improvement. If there is only small improvement I cannot define the result as fantastic. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.