Author: Pat King
Date: 13:55:43 03/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 12, 2004 at 14:42:23, Renze Steenhuisen wrote: > >Hi all, > >I wondered, why does my Quiescence Search cause the overall move-ordering to >drop? Not sure what you mean by "drop", but sounds bad. >I use PVS and a Transposition Table for early cutoff and move suggestion from >the TT. Many people, including myself (who cares?) and Bob Hyatt (ok, he knows what he's doing) don't use the TT in the hash table. The idea is that MVV/LVA works just fine for QSearch, and you don't fill up the hash table with a bunch of junk from way out at the edges of the tree. >My evaluation function is very simple and I only use static >move-ordering for the moment. > >Any ideas? > Restrict TT to the normal search. Use incremental sort for history and MVV/LVA, it's pretty trivial to implement. >Cheers! > Renze Ever the newbie, Pat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.