Author: Dan Kiski
Date: 08:35:09 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 11:05:25, Mark Young wrote: >On December 10, 1998 at 10:56:28, Dan Kiski wrote: > >>On December 10, 1998 at 10:08:04, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:55:37, Dan Kiski wrote: >>> >>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:42:03, Mark Young wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:13:52, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:44:29, Mark Young wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:34:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>So are You testing with random openings. If yes I think 14 games is almost >>>>>>>>meaningless! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It is not just 14 games. I am running the same settings as other people that are >>>>>>>posting here. *To add to the game count*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I could not run any more games then what I did for this testing. This was the >>>>>>>limit for CM at one time. And if you read my post, I am running more games with >>>>>>>the same settings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>SO IT IS NOT MEANINGLESS!!! >>>>>> >>>>>>As I already stated I agree meaningless, the nunn positions as a start basis >>>>>>should be utilized, since opening books are so large and any results over 14 >>>>>>games could be only based on opening advantage. >>>>> >>>>>I sorry, I must be typing in an invisible ink. WE ARE PLAYING MORE THE 14 GAMES. >>>>> THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN MORE THE 14 GAMES WITH MOST OF THESE SETTING POSTED >>>>>ALREADY. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Dan Kiski >>>> >>>>Ok so you are playing more than 14 games, how many opening variations does your >>>>computer play, will you play them all as white and black. I can read your ink >>>>just can't see why you don't see the results as what they are MEANINGLESS. And >>>>that in fact you are just wasting your time by even playing them without setting >>>>out specific unbiased criteria for how you are playing them. >>> >>>I am just lost, I have only been testing chess programs for over 15 years. >>> >>>You don't know what criteria I have laid out. Because all I am doing is sharing >>>raw game data with others that are doing the same thing. >>> >>You have no criteria, >Wow, What else do you know. Is this just your opinion or are you stating a fact? > > no set openings, no set game amount limitation. As for >>time testing, > >I bought a chess challenger 7 in 1978, > >So did I but there was not much to test it against in 78. > > >I guess I'll claim 20 >>years. > >I don't care what you claim for yourself, Just don't make claim about me. >Because you don't know what you are talking about. I never made any claim about you ?? I made a statement about the games tests you were playing, how would I know what I am talking about when I don't know you??. However I like all others am entitled to my opinion of the tests you conduct and post here, and fortunately am entitled to post what that opinion is. FREE SPEECH. Dan Kiski.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.