Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: A shroud of darkness befalls the election process..

Author: steven blincoe

Date: 15:56:28 03/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


>>
>>>>Final Results:
>>>>Michael Byrne  28.29 %
>>>>Richard Pijl   24.22 %
>>>>Russell Reagan 21.12 %
>>>>Peter Skinner  13.95 %
>>>>Stuart Taylor  12.40 %
>
>It is a well-known annoyance in voting procedures that many people will vote for
>the first N names on the ballot they see. The candidates appeared in
>alphabetical order, and the first N were the winners.


while it cannot be said for certain that this indeed is what occurred,a shroud
of doubt now covers the election process.
 i hereby and forthwith  make the following Election procedure modification
recommendations:

Firstly..to insure that voters will no longer pick the first 3 names by
alphabetical order at the top of the list...

each time the ballot page is refreshed, the candidates names should be randomly
ordered on the election list,much like Fischer Random Chess

people wishing to vote for the candidates they want will of course be uneffected
by the placement of names on the list and those that choose otherwise will not
be creating an election result skewed towards a candidates name by birth

Secondly...
before a vote can be officially tallied, a series of emails should be initiated
between the voter and the folks maintaining this site

first a request to place the vote,,followed by a "go ahead and vote"reply
then a reply confirming that the vote was indeed cast,to be followed up by a
confirmation of same

i invision perhaps no more then 6-8 back and forth emails before the vote is
officially counted

the slight drawback of this of course, is that instead of 525 some odd votes
cast the total would probably be reduced to under 25,,but the quality and
integrity of the voting will be restored

Lastly..it should be noted that many tens of thousands of  chess programmers
gave their very lifes in order for us to exercise the freedom to vote in free
elections here ..i think we should take at least vote by am means other then
pure hunt and peck


Respectfully Submitted
Steve Blincoe




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.