Author: Dan Kiski
Date: 09:01:11 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 11:51:17, Mark Young wrote: >On December 10, 1998 at 11:35:09, Dan Kiski wrote: > >>On December 10, 1998 at 11:05:25, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On December 10, 1998 at 10:56:28, Dan Kiski wrote: >>> >>>>On December 10, 1998 at 10:08:04, Mark Young wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:55:37, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:42:03, Mark Young wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:13:52, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:44:29, Mark Young wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:34:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>So are You testing with random openings. If yes I think 14 games is almost >>>>>>>>>>meaningless! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>It is not just 14 games. I am running the same settings as other people that are >>>>>>>>>posting here. *To add to the game count*. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I could not run any more games then what I did for this testing. This was the >>>>>>>>>limit for CM at one time. And if you read my post, I am running more games with >>>>>>>>>the same settings. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>SO IT IS NOT MEANINGLESS!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>As I already stated I agree meaningless, the nunn positions as a start basis >>>>>>>>should be utilized, since opening books are so large and any results over 14 >>>>>>>>games could be only based on opening advantage. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I sorry, I must be typing in an invisible ink. WE ARE PLAYING MORE THE 14 GAMES. >>>>>>> THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN MORE THE 14 GAMES WITH MOST OF THESE SETTING POSTED >>>>>>>ALREADY. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Dan Kiski >>>>>> >>>>>>Ok so you are playing more than 14 games, how many opening variations does your >>>>>>computer play, will you play them all as white and black. I can read your ink >>>>>>just can't see why you don't see the results as what they are MEANINGLESS. And >>>>>>that in fact you are just wasting your time by even playing them without setting >>>>>>out specific unbiased criteria for how you are playing them. >>>>> >>>>>I am just lost, I have only been testing chess programs for over 15 years. >>>>> >>>>>You don't know what criteria I have laid out. Because all I am doing is sharing >>>>>raw game data with others that are doing the same thing. >>>>> >>>>You have no criteria, >>>Wow, What else do you know. Is this just your opinion or are you stating a fact? >>> >>> no set openings, no set game amount limitation. As for >>>>time testing, >>> >>>I bought a chess challenger 7 in 1978, >>> >>>So did I but there was not much to test it against in 78. >>> >>> >>>I guess I'll claim 20 >>>>years. >>> >>>I don't care what you claim for yourself, Just don't make claim about me. >>>Because you don't know what you are talking about. >> >>I never made any claim about you ?? > >Yes you have "You have no criteria" You made a claim about me and what I am >doing with this data I am sharing and the data and setting I am getting from >other people. You don't have a clue in what I am doing with this data I am >sharing. Nor have you asked. So why don't you before you open your mouth and >make a fool of yourself again I see exactly what you are doing with the data as others also do, and I repeat you have no criteria, and I repeat I am entitled to my opinion. If you don't like my opinions that's too bad, but I will post whatever I want when I want. I don't have to ask about the criteria others have and I have seen the response. If you choose to take the no criteria as a personnel comment on you, then so be it that is your problem, however according to all these posts I am not the only one with this opinion. Dan Kiski > > I made a statement about the games tests you >>were playing, how would I know what I am talking about when I don't know you??. >>However I like all others am entitled to my opinion of the tests you conduct and >>post here, and fortunately am entitled to post what that opinion is. >>FREE SPEECH. > >Yes you have FREE SPEECH, And I am not stopping you from posting. I love it. I >will give you all the rope you want. > >>Dan Kiski.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.