Author: Mark Young
Date: 09:13:00 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 12:10:12, Dan Kiski wrote: >On December 10, 1998 at 12:07:50, Mark Young wrote: > >>On December 10, 1998 at 12:01:11, Dan Kiski wrote: >> >>>On December 10, 1998 at 11:51:17, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>On December 10, 1998 at 11:35:09, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 11:05:25, Mark Young wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 10:56:28, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 10:08:04, Mark Young wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:55:37, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:42:03, Mark Young wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 09:13:52, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:44:29, Mark Young wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:34:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>So are You testing with random openings. If yes I think 14 games is almost >>>>>>>>>>>>>meaningless! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>It is not just 14 games. I am running the same settings as other people that are >>>>>>>>>>>>posting here. *To add to the game count*. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I could not run any more games then what I did for this testing. This was the >>>>>>>>>>>>limit for CM at one time. And if you read my post, I am running more games with >>>>>>>>>>>>the same settings. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>SO IT IS NOT MEANINGLESS!!! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>As I already stated I agree meaningless, the nunn positions as a start basis >>>>>>>>>>>should be utilized, since opening books are so large and any results over 14 >>>>>>>>>>>games could be only based on opening advantage. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I sorry, I must be typing in an invisible ink. WE ARE PLAYING MORE THE 14 GAMES. >>>>>>>>>> THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN MORE THE 14 GAMES WITH MOST OF THESE SETTING POSTED >>>>>>>>>>ALREADY. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Dan Kiski >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Ok so you are playing more than 14 games, how many opening variations does your >>>>>>>>>computer play, will you play them all as white and black. I can read your ink >>>>>>>>>just can't see why you don't see the results as what they are MEANINGLESS. And >>>>>>>>>that in fact you are just wasting your time by even playing them without setting >>>>>>>>>out specific unbiased criteria for how you are playing them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I am just lost, I have only been testing chess programs for over 15 years. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You don't know what criteria I have laid out. Because all I am doing is sharing >>>>>>>>raw game data with others that are doing the same thing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>You have no criteria, >>>>>>Wow, What else do you know. Is this just your opinion or are you stating a fact? >>>>>> >>>>>> no set openings, no set game amount limitation. As for >>>>>>>time testing, >>>>>> >>>>>>I bought a chess challenger 7 in 1978, >>>>>> >>>>>>So did I but there was not much to test it against in 78. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I guess I'll claim 20 >>>>>>>years. >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't care what you claim for yourself, Just don't make claim about me. >>>>>>Because you don't know what you are talking about. >>>>> >>>>>I never made any claim about you ?? >>>> >>>>Yes you have "You have no criteria" You made a claim about me and what I am >>>>doing with this data I am sharing and the data and setting I am getting from >>>>other people. You don't have a clue in what I am doing with this data I am >>>>sharing. Nor have you asked. So why don't you before you open your mouth and >>>>make a fool of yourself again >>> >>>I see exactly what you are doing with the data as others also do, >> >>Please let us all know wise one. What am I doing with the data? Give us your >>opinion on what I am doing. Please post more. > >Now I get it, you are that single female member, the one who needs and has to >have the last word. Go ahead prove it by responding to this post !!! Ok I took the bait, You are much to smart for me. See if you can bait me in again. :) >Dan Kiski > > > >> >> >> and I repeat >>>you have no criteria, and I repeat I am entitled to my opinion. If you don't >>>like my opinions that's too bad, but I will post whatever I want when I want. >>>I don't have to ask about the criteria others have and I have seen the response. >>>If you choose to take the no criteria as a personnel comment on you, then so be >>>it that is your problem, however according to all these posts I am not the only >>>one with this opinion. >>>Dan Kiski >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> I made a statement about the games tests you >>>>>were playing, how would I know what I am talking about when I don't know you??. >>>>>However I like all others am entitled to my opinion of the tests you conduct and >>>>>post here, and fortunately am entitled to post what that opinion is. >>>>>FREE SPEECH. >>>> >>>>Yes you have FREE SPEECH, And I am not stopping you from posting. I love it. I >>>>will give you all the rope you want. >>>> >>>>>Dan Kiski.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.