Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: a fatal Shredder 8 hash resizing bug

Author: F. Huber

Date: 13:43:23 03/13/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 13, 2004 at 14:23:15, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On March 13, 2004 at 11:46:51, F. Huber wrote:
>
>>So what will you be trying next (and the software should take care of)?
>>Adding or removing memory modules, while the computer in ON
>>and Windows is running? ;-)
>>And then writing here again:"Windows bug - system crashes if ..."
>
>I don't see too much similarity in your example and the original problem. I
>think, the software should take care there. The main difference is: the software
>itself allows you to change the hash, so it is under its control (unlike a
>hardware change). Also, for example the UCI protocol explicetly disallows the
>setoption command during search. If you change any parameter the search will be
>stopped, and then new parameters (for example hash size) are sent to the engine.
>In my experience, this works well under Shredder Classic. It allows seemingly to
>change parameters during analysis, but stops the search, before they are really
>changed.
>
>Regards,
>Dieter

Of course you can do whatever you want when running any software,
but one thing should be clear:
If you do a stupid action, don“t wonder about a stupid REaction! ;-)

Regards,
Franz.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.