Author: Ralph E. Carter
Date: 12:36:07 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 1998 at 15:47:57, Mark Young wrote: >On December 09, 1998 at 08:35:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 09, 1998 at 06:36:02, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>Many of use have played over the games of Deep Blue Vs GM Kasparov , and Rebel >>>10 Vs GM Anand. >>> >>>My question is what do you think would be the stronger chess program, and by how >>>much: >>> >>>Deep Blue, or Rebel 10 (K6 450Mhz) * 1000 >> >> >>this question makes no sense. > >You miss the point of the question, but thats ok. > > In the two longer games Rebel had no real chance, > >Ok, If Rebel or any current top program could run 1000 times faster, Would it >then have a chance in a match with Kasparov or Anand. And would that chance be >better or worse then the last version of Deep Blue. IYO. If frogs had pockets... Did you read my previous post? Your question makes *no* sense. The technology is *not* available. *I* have studied the matter. These off-hand hypotheticals go nowhere. > > >>while deep blue won the match it played. You aren't going to see a rebel*1000 >>in the next hundred years, probably. Because technology is nowhere near even >>thinking about machines with picosecond cycle types. The technology to produce >>such technology doesn't exist yet... >> >>The next problem is that a special-purpose piece of hardware will *always* be >>orders of magnitude faster than general-purpose hardware, so that if we wait for >>a 1000x faster rebel, we get a 10000x faster deep blue in the process...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.